Diana Florence says landlords who game the rent-regulation system ought to face criminal sanctions.

Diana Florence

Florence for DA

Diana Florence, a nearly 25-year veteran of the Manhattan DA’s office, resigned earlier this year and has joined the crowded field challenging incumbent Cyrus Vance.

An alleged child sex trafficker. An admitted embezzler. An accused terrorist. Such are the people whom the Manhattan district attorney has charged or convicted in recent weeks.

At least one DA candidate wants to add “fraudulent landlord” to that list.

Diana Florence is one of nine candidates challenging incumbent DA Cyrus Vance in a primary race that will culminate next June 2021. She entered the race this summer after 25 years in the DA’s office, including a stint as head of its Construction Fraud Task Force and a high-profile win against a construction firm for falsifying strength tests on concrete used to rebuild the World Trade Center.

With that experience at the top of her resume, Florence is focusing heavily on her desire to prosecute law-breaking developers and property owners. She wrote in an AMNewYork op-ed in July that rent-regulated landlords who falsify the costs used to justify rent hikes ought to be prosecuted. In a Gotham Gazette column last month, she said the same about developers who abuse the self-certification system and construct buildings out of step with zoning laws.

In an interview with City Limits, Florence said her focus on real estate is part of a broader view about the nature of crime.

“The old, traditional way of thinking about crime is a robbery or a shop-lift or a murder or rape,” she says. Those are real crimes. When it comes to taking property, however, the conventional definition of crime is too narrow. “If I steal your iPhone, that’s ‘a crime.’ If I steal your wages, that’s ‘civil.’” A more holistic concept of crime, Florence argues, would treat both acts as theft.

Rent laws, apartment improvements, and fraud

In the city’s nearly 1 million rent-regulated apartments, rent usually can rise each year only by the percentage approved by the city’s Rent Guidelines Board. However, a landlords can get an extra increase if he performs a major capital improvement (MCI) that affects an entire building, like replacing a boiler or roof, or does an individual apartment improvement (IAI), which involves investment in a particular unit between tenants.

While tenant advocates have long blamed MCIs for driving up rents, and faulted state regulators for rubber-stamping them, at least MCIs are subject to a form of review. Landlords don’t need any approval to impose IAIs, which has made that mechanism susceptible to fraud.

In her AMNewYork op-ed, Florence argued that IAI fraud deserves to be treated as a crime. “In New York, it is a felony to file a false statement with a public agency. It is also a felony to use false pretenses to steal thousands of dollars from a person. Each false document carries a term of imprisonment of up to four years,” she wrote. “The fact is, housing fraud is a systematic crime of power that has ripple effects on every part of society, and law enforcement needs to start treating it as such.”

Florence’s argument is that a single instance of IAI fraud has long-term consequences and broad impact. Once a hike in the legal rent occurs, it affects everyone who rents the apartment in later years. What’s more, an illegal hike in rent squeezes what a tenant might purchase from other businesses. And a landlord who games the system makes it tougher for law-abiding landlords to compete. “It’s tricking down to everything else,” Florence says.

The 2019 reforms to the state’s rent-regulation law scaled back the amount of rent increase a landlord can get from an individual apartment improvement and limited the lifespan of those increases, likely curtailing the potential for fraud. A state court later tossed out part of the 2019 law, ruling that its tighter cost caps could not be applied retroactively, and limiting to four years the “lookback period” to prove that the landlord had improperly calculated the legal rent.

Neither development dissuades Florence. “[The ruling didn’t] impact the underlying fraud that happened before June of 2019. The lookback period has never been affected by fraud – if you prove fraud, you can go back to 1864,” she said. The fact that current rents could reflect fraud committed decades ago “can keep a whole prosecutor’s office busy for years to come.”

An active hunt

Investigations dating back to before Lee’s surrender at Appomattox are unlikely—the rent regulation law didn’t exist before 1969. And while she says a major reorganization of the DA’s staff is overdue, Florence says she doesn’t plan to build the entire office around chasing rental fraud.

She does, however, plan to actively hunt for fraud cases, by partnering with community organizations to uncover cases, setting up an app for people to report it and scrutinizing civil filings to detect disputes over legal rent. Florence believes a few, high-profile cases will create a deterrent effect.

“When you target a practice, you just have to bring the biggest cases and the industry will take notice,” she says. Then the office might declare a period of amnesty, where landlords can come forward, cop to having cheated in the past, agree on some sort of make-good, and avoid criminal prosecution.

It is not unheard of for landlords to face criminal prosecution: An investigation by the city-state Tenant Harassment Task Force led to landlord Steve Croman doing a stint in jail from 2017 to 2018 for mortgage and tax fraud.

However, according to a spokesman, DA Vance has never prosecuted anyone for IAI fraud.

In the resignation letter she sent to Vance in January, Florence alleged that the DA had prevented her from pursuing landlord fraud. Florence also complained that she had been subjected to a “hostile work environment” and “bullying” while on Vance’s staff.

Asked about those claims, a spokeswoman for the DA told City Limits: “This is false. Because the office cannot comment on personnel matters or investigations, we will have to decline to comment further.”

Prior to her leaving the DA’s office, Florence faced allegations of prosecutorial conduct for withholding key evidence about a cooperating witness in a bribery case. She has denied that she knowingly withheld the information.

Incarceration as leverage

The reaction to Florence’s proposal from key players in New York City’s housing policy world was, no surprise, split.. “I think that it’s a very good idea,” says Michael McKee, the treasurer of TenantsPAC. “Obviously strengthening the law is of paramount importance, but more proactive enforcement of the tenant protection laws would be highly useful.”

“If forced to choose between stronger laws and stronger enforcement, I would come down emphatically in favor of strengthening the laws,” McKee adds. “That gives tenants a tool we can use to force government to move—for example, we can sue to force the particular agency to enforce the law.”

Frank Ricci, the vice president for government affairs at the Rent Stabilization Association, a trade association for rent-regulated landlords, believes the law enforcement role must be strictly limited.

“I agree that an unscrupulous owner like the owners in Brooklyn several years ago that removed a bathroom and kitchen and then took months to replace them should be prosecuted. They give all owners a bad reputation,” Ricci said. Overall, however, “Prosecuting owners for overcharge complaints is a waste of taxpayer money.”

Florence (who says she is not accepting real-estate donations to her campaign) argues that treating landlord fraud as a civil matter does not create enough of a deterrent, because businesses know they will rarely be caught and can treat the payment of an occasional civil fine as merely part of the cost of doing business.

However, the chief punitive value of criminal prosecution—that it could lead to incarceration—is also its biggest potential problem. Today’s mainstream discussion around criminal justice policy is moving away from arrest, prosecution and incarceration for a range of offenses.

Florence stresses that “prosecution doesn’t mean incarceration, it means consequences,” in particular, an arrest can prevent a firm from receiving government contracts and could obstruct a landowner’s financing. Financial restitution is another potential result. However, achieving those punishments, especially when a plea deal is struck to avoid the risk and expense of a trial, often depends on prosecutors wielding the threat of incarceration.

What role does fraud play?

New York City’s housing problem is sprawling: More than half a million households pay more than 50 percent of their income in rent, and the connection among unaffordable rent, evictions and homelessness is well established.

Fraud undoubtedly plays some role in the affordability crisis, but larger forces are also at play, including the harsh rules of supply and demand, dwindling buildable land, gaping income and wealth inequality.

Florence acknowledges that prosecuting landlord fraud will not be a silver bullet but insists it will be a meaningful move. “These are all connected because at the end of the day when we talk about affordable housing in New York City we have to look at it holistically, and each of these unenforced frauds contributes to this attitude of the Wild West,” she says. “If you start to attack the fraud, I believe it will have a cascading effect on the housing crisis and affordability.”

Other candidates for DA include , Tahanie Aboushi, Alvin Bragg, Liz Crotty, Lucy Lang, Janos Marton, Eliza Orlins, Dan Quart, Tali Farhadian Weinstein and the incumbent, Vance, who was first elected in 2009.

2 thoughts on “In ‘Holistic’ Approach to Crime, DA Hopeful Wants to Prosecute Landlords

  1. Dear Jarrett,

    Thank you very much for this excellent article. Diana Florence would be a terrific
    District Attorney. So many of these landlords, especially Steve Croman are no different than a drug cartel and they have gotten away with so much all these years because there has been no enforcement of the laws. The very agencies that were set up to protect tenants have failed us. I speak as a tenant who has been living in a Steve Croman owned building since 1999 and it’s been pure hell. Although he was prosecuted and went to jail, he got away with so much fraud and criminal activity, and it’s mind-boggling that his accomplices got off scot-free. The restitution to tenants can never make up for all the heartache, damage and destruction he and his cohorts have inflicted on his tenants. No amount of money can ever heal the hurt and damage Steve and Harriet Croman caused their tenants and continues to do so. Thank you, I look forward to more of your excellent articles. Cynthia Chaffee, Co-founder of the Stop Croman Coalition

  2. I have the very unfortunate experience of living in a rent controlled building owned by Convicted Felon Steve Croman, and currently managed by the equally corrupt company NYCM. NYCM is only a wolf in sheep’s clothing as it is mostly staffed by 9300 Realty employees, still reporting directly to Steve Croman, in violation of the Consent Decree against Croman. My building has lost FOUR RENT CONTROLLED/ STABILIZED in the past year through eviction proceedings and Tenant’s deaths. What is really the NEW CRIME is Criminal Landlords like Steve Croman, and by proxy, NYCM are WAREHOUSING these Rent Controlled/ Stabilized Units. They are not looking to rent them under the current Stabilization Laws, so they just keep them emptied and abandoned.
    Steve Croman is already a Convicted Felon and now NYCM is doing his dirty work. When will this new crime of NOT making units available be addressed?
    When will organized crime companies like NYCM and 9300 Realty be held to account for their misdeeds and Fraud.
    God Forbid Tenant Harassment, which is alive and well and substandard maintenance; when will these criminal Management Companies be held responsible and fined and punished accordingly?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *