Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

COVID-19 Prompts New Concerns About the Gowanus Rezoning

8 Comments

  • Margaret Maugenest
    Posted May 20, 2020 at 11:37 pm

    Brad Lander: “the principles that the planning for the Gowanus neighborhood rezoning was built around” – the whole process of “Bridging Gowanus” (the process to which Mr. Lander refers) was a ruse meant to make it appear that the Gowanus rezoning plan came from the community. There were no principles except to hand over the neighborhood to the developers. 30-story building in a flood zone/hurricane evacuation route. COVID 19 has shown that the USA needs to keep, encourage, protect manufacturing zoning – and that dense residential is detrimental to human health. There’s no need for it – people are rethinking living in NY, many are leaving or will be leaving. COVID 19 has to be seriously considerted, addressed, and NY rezoning to keep building more and more residential has to stop.

    • Rob Puc
      Posted May 25, 2020 at 4:51 pm

      I agree

  • Tom Angotti
    Posted May 21, 2020 at 1:27 pm

    The Gowanus rezoning makes no sense. It was premised on a significant expansion of real estate development and with the current and expected economic downturn that will not happen. But new development makes absolutely no sense in the Gowanus and other waterfront neighborhoods when sea level rise is inevitable and not entirely predictable in its scope; and the city has no clear and adequately funded long-term strategy for its extensive waterfront. Gowanus is still laden with toxicity resulting from a history of development that ignored environmental and public health concerns; why risk yet further catastrophe? Finally, the exclusion of public housing is even more shameful when it is allowed by officials who claim to be advocates of social justice.

  • Derek
    Posted May 28, 2020 at 12:22 am

    I have lived in the rezoning area for two decades and I am in favor of it. I have watched mini storage and hotels now used to house homeless rise around me. The small restaurants, bars and retail need more people living here to thrive. The district was last zoned in the 1960s. Manufacturing has moved out of the city and the country and homelessness and lack of affordable housing are on the rise. The idea a city should stay static because some people are nostalgic or because public housing is falling apart and underfunded are short sighted. I don’t love every part of the plan. I didn’t get what I wanted for my property. But the community had input and compromises were made. You don’t create new housing and lower housing prices by squashing every rezoning plan. This is a failure of elected leaders to lead. This rezoning was proposed in 2007. It’s time to move forward. We all are not going to get what we want But that shouldn’t mean a few people should be able to prevent the city from moving forward and they don’t speak for everyone in the community.

    • Margaret Maugenest
      Posted June 5, 2020 at 9:48 pm

      The Gowanus neighborhood doesn’t have: a hospital, a library, a fire department, open space (except for a postage-sized open space not central to the neighborhood on 12th Street and 2nd Ave – right next to the sanitation depot).
      It has: one public school (elementary), a very limited bus route, limited SRO (standing room only) on the subway lines, high unemployment rate, 50K median household income, ancient infrastructure, a toxic canal, serious flooding during hurricane season, combined sewer overflows., a polluted Thomas Greene Park built on toxic land, a Superfund clean-up that won’t be completed for another 10-20 years.
      The proposed rezoning plan doesn’t address any of these issues. Bridging Gowanus did not address the public housing (NYCHA)problem either (and there are many).
      How is the proposed rezoning plan a “moving forward?” Call it for what it is: a land grab.

      • Armandhammer
        Posted July 14, 2020 at 2:07 am

        “no open space” Are you kidding!? Have you ever walked around the two lovely housing projects??? They are full of courts and grassy patches for recreation. Not to mention the excellent Nicholas Naquan Hayward park complete with summer fountains. Also as to the lack schools and libraries, there hopefully aren’t many kids living in the current mini storage places that populate most of the neighborhood outside the projects.

      • GR
        Posted November 17, 2020 at 11:00 am

        er, there’s a fire station on Bond Street? Public housing, yes, rising sea levels, yes…all interesting but Gowanus is a post industrial, toxic dump. Plain and simple. There is no magic city pot of money to fix Gowanus and never, ever, will be. NYC is broke and the pandemic has made it worse. Who will spend money to develop former industrial sites other than developers? At least they are interested in building above future flood levels. Public housing…er, sure…but developers don’t want to pay for it and if NYC does, we get Gowanus Houses 2.0 and they don’t look like a happy place to me. Take what you can from the developers and move on. That’s a better deal than the current position – 100% of a toxic waste dump.

  • Margaret Maugenest
    Posted June 6, 2020 at 5:54 pm

    errata – land and SKY grab (with 30+ stories proposed)

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: