Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Life Near a Landfill: The Towns and People Who End Up with NYC Trash

5 Comments

  • EnergyJustice
    Posted May 22, 2015 at 3:04 pm

    Thanks for covering these sides of the story, Jarrett! So much to add, though…

    * The “waste-to-energy” term… to see why it’s inaccurate, see: https://www.energyjustice.net/incineration/waste-to-energy

    * Incinerators still require landfills for their toxic ash. For every 100 tons burned, you get 30 tons of ash (the 10% figure is by volume, but disposal is done by tonnage). This makes the landfills more toxic, threatening groundwater, after the incinerator makes the air far more toxic than a landfill ever could on its own.

    * The Chester, PA incinerator (“Covanta Delaware Valley”) is lacking the “sophisticated filtering systems” that most incinerators have. It’s totally missing any controls for nitrogen oxides (NOx) that cause asthma, which is why that incinerator is one of the largest sources of NOx in the region. Most incinerators have these, plus carbon injection to limit mercury and dioxin pollution. The Chester incinerator doesn’t, even though it’s the nation’s largest and in a dense, urban black community. Even EPA inspectors questioned this (but did nothing about it). See https://www.ejnet.org/chester/pollutioncontrol.html and https://www.ejnet.org/chester/covantapollution.html Of all 80-some trash incinerators in the nation, the Chester plant is #1 in particulate matter, #3 in sulfur dioxide pollution, #6 in mercury and #7 in NOx, according to the latest national data from EPA (National Emissions Inventory, 2011).

    * The article says that methane gas is 30 times more potent than carbon dioxide. It’s actually 34 times more, if you still look at it over a 100 year time-frame, but the latest science looking at it over a (more appropriate) 20-year time frame, shows that it’s 86 times as bad as CO2. See https://www.energyjustice.net/naturalgas#GWP That’s why we need to digest trash before landfilling it (and skip the incinerator altogether), to minimize global warming pollution. Incinerators are 2.5 times as bad as coal plants for global warming, according to EPA’s eGRID data — looking at it in tons of CO2 per megawatthours generated. Conventional landfills are even worse because of the methane, but not if you digest things first, to get the methane out in an enclosed situation where it’s possible to capture it all. This also avoids having gassy, stinky landfills. Here’s what a real zero waste system looks like: http://www.energyjustice.net/zerowaste/

    Unfortunately, the 20-30 year contract to burn trash in Chester and Niagara Falls has provisions that make it costly for NYC to back out of it, essentially locking in the worst possible option for what to do with the waste. NYC could at least have required that Covanta bring it to plants that have modern pollution controls installed! This injustice needs to be addressed. Poisoning Chester, PA residents for 20-30 more years is unacceptable. Black lives matter.

  • Roberta G. Zuckerman
    Posted May 28, 2015 at 2:16 pm

    Plans are that the garbage from the East 91st Street Marine Transfer Station in NYC will ultimately be sent to Chester Pennsylvania so what is being accomplished by building this WHITE ELEPHANT?

  • James Hack
    Posted May 29, 2015 at 10:18 am

    A well written and concise article about NYC’s waste problem. I wish more focus was on how inefficient and wasteful DSNY is with its long-term waste disposal contracts. The DSNY has a budget of over $1 billion per year and does not charge for its service. Their budget comes from the general fund. The only way to get people to recycle and reduce waste is to actually charge for disposal. But the DSNY response is always that NYC is unique from other cities because it’s made up of high rise buildings and you can’t determine who is throwing out what. That’s nonsense because the DSNY should just charge the whole building for the waste it generates and leave it up to the building on how to divide the bill among residents. Sadly, there is very little traction to move this initiative forward.

    • DLH
      Posted May 31, 2015 at 8:03 am

      You are right – NYC is drowning in the garbage we all create and the only way to stem the tide is through price incentives. Most cities charge for garbage collection and disposal directly – often as a utility. Residents and businesses in these cities can see exactly what they pay – and the cities are able to offer cost savings or increases if the amount of waste set out for collection is changed. NYC pays for waste management out of a huge general tax fund – so NYers have no way to know what they pay for garbage processing – and they have no way to change how much they pay by reducing, reusing and recycling more waste.
      DSNY and City Hall have avoided facing our waste problems directly by coming up with costly, elaborate and outdated schemes to move garbage around differently – and send it far away to distant, poor cities for incineration and landfilling. One of these schemes (E91 MTS) will triple what we pay for garbage processing without addressing the real issue – the huge amount of waste we generate. It’s time for NYC to face the problem and develop real solutions – make it easier to reduce, reuse and recycle – and develop a price incentive plan to change behavior.

  • Laura
    Posted June 3, 2015 at 1:42 pm

    People of Staten Island dealt with this for years and years , and no one really cared. The amount of people who lived near the dump with cancer is outrageous; people with no history of cancer, no attributing lifestyle choices other than the dump and no one cared because it was Staten Island.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: