The local chapter of Drug Free World is operated out of Scientology headquarters but the program's literature makes no mention of the church or its founder L. Ron Hubbard's controversial theories about drugs and addiction.

Photo by: Adi Talwar

The local chapter of Drug Free World is operated out of Scientology headquarters but the program’s literature makes no mention of the church or its founder L. Ron Hubbard’s controversial theories about drugs and addiction.

By its own estimate, Foundation for a Drug Free World, an education non-profit, has visited at least 20 percent of New York City’s schools, public and private. That’s over 14,000 children, it says, mainly in disadvantaged schools in outer boroughs. Drug Free World has won accolades from the City Council and the state Senate and been featured by over a dozen local publications, including the Daily News.

But in two recent presentations witnessed by a City Limits reporter, the organization—which is connected to the Church of Scientology—presented information on the dangers of drug abuse that had little basis in fact and could be traced to the works of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard.

In a section of its website titled “How We Help,” the Church of Scientology lays claim to Drug Free World and a slew of other nonprofits, including Narconon, a faith-based drug rehabilitation program. Though Drug Free World is a secular program, chapters in California and Pennsylvania have directed addicts to Narconon, whose rehab procedures are discredited by medical science.

There’s no evidence that’s been done by the New York chapter of Drug Free World, founded eight years ago by Meghan Fialkoff—a Scientologist from Bayside, Queens—after completing her undergraduate degree in public relations at the University of Maryland. With Fialkoff at the lead, Drug Free World has visited daycares, YMCAs, NYPD youth programs, homeless shelters, community fairs, and churches. The group posts the thank-you notes it receives from administrators on its website. Dating from early 2012 onward, there are hundreds.

Claims about flashbacks

Fialkoff, who denies the program’s links to Scientology, declined to allow a reporter to attend a Drug Free World presentation. But during an interview, the group’s photographer extended an invitation to a presentation at Little Flower, a Catholic after-school program for troubled teenagers in Queens.

There, in the vaulted stone rectory, Drug Free World’s presenter David Tidman battled the Friday afternoon doldrums.

“You know mushrooms? They’re a funny brand of plant. Some mushrooms are good in salad, like Portobello. Some mushrooms will give you hallucinations for hours. Some mushrooms will kill you in two hours flat, just like that.”

“‘Shrooms,” a girl echoed, dreamily.

“They take they damn selves,” another girl added, expressing her approval of the popular psychedelic. Both girls giggled.

Tidman is Drug Free World’s lead presenter in New York City. He took a fatherly tone with the teens while explaining how all drugs, not just LSD, can cause flashbacks.

“A certain amount of that drug or medicine stays in your body for weeks, months, even years, and later on what happens is it can dislodge from the fat tissue and reactivate in your body,” he said.

At odds with science

The concept of the human body storing lipid-soluble drugs for years comes from Clear Body, Clear Mind, a self-help book compiled from materials written by L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the Church of Scientology. The book outlines a detoxification regimen used by a number of Scientology-funded groups, including Narconon. Drug Free World’s materials make no mention of the flashback theory, or any Scientology for that matter, but Tidman used it in both presentations City Limits witnessed.

Dr. Amir Garakani, a psychopharmacology specialist at Mount Sinai Hospital, called Tidman’s theory an overgeneralization: while LSD is linked to flashbacks, other drugs aren’t. “There’s no pharmacological basis for that. It’s not accurate,” he said.

While Drug Free World has multiple presenters, Tidman is its main man in New York City. He estimates he presented to 15,000 children last year, so many that he’s forced to recycle near verbatim his jokes, analogies, and anecdotes. Take, for example, the evening of December 13, when Tidman visited the Parent Teacher Association at Herbert Lehman High School in the Bronx.

“Some mushrooms are good in a salad,” Tidman said. “Others will make you sick and give you hallucinations for hours. Some will kill you in a matter of hours.”

And again, the fatty tissue theory.

“Ever notice how in the hottest part of summertime how people drive on the B.Q.E. [Brooklyn-Queens Expressway]? Or the Bruckner?” Drug flashbacks were responsible, he said.

The parents were boisterous and responsive. They laughed at his jokes. Afterward Tidman said he thought it went well, but Rosaline Torruella, the parent-teacher coordinator, disagreed. Whether Tidman knew it or not, he had been auditioning to the parents. Torruella said she decided there were too many inaccuracies for another invitation to be extended.

Links to the Church?

Tidman, a member of the Church of Scientology, is not paid for his presentations; he says he makes a living working for a dentist’s office. The dentist is Bernard Fialkoff, Meghan Fialkoff’s father, a high-ranking Scientologist who funds Drug Free World both out of pocket and through his study club of local doctors.

Fialkoff acknowledges that the New York City chapter of Drug Free World is run by Scientologists out of church headquarters in Times Square, yet denies that Drug Free World is a Scientology program. “There’s a lot of sponsors for the program. One of them happens to be the Church of Scientology,” she said. And if Tidman had deviated from the carefully secularized materials, that could be corrected, she added.

Through Bernard Fialkoff’s dental study club, Drug Free World has solicited awards from State Senator José Peralta, as well as former Councilman Dan Halloran, who is now under indictment for corruption. Both issued proclamations honoring the organization. Neither official responded to requests for comment.

How effective?

In at least one respect, Drug Free World’s presentations resemble a visit from D.A.R.E. or many other anti-drug organizations: After the kids file out of the room, it’s hard to tell whether the message stuck.

On the way out of Little Flower, Tidman recognized the difficulty in changing at-risk children’s behavior over sporadic, hour-long visits.

“Once you’re gone, many of the students don’t even know you were there,” he said.

Tidman said he wishes he could spend more time with smaller groups of children, but the organization is always pushing for more presentations in new places.

But most schools seem happy with what they get. In March 2014, Leydy Avila of Sunnyside Community Services in Queens wrote to the group, “As a Director, I strive to be able to provide an excellent program for my children that will be well-rounded for their needs. However, due to budget constraints as you can imagine it is often difficult to achieve this without sacrificing something. Having organizations and individuals like you […] and the flexibility to accommodate so many of my children was really appreciated.”

When asked how he could measure the effectiveness of his program, Tidman doesn’t have a ready answer. There is a follow-up mechanism called “Drug Free Marshals,” where at the end of a presentation children—without providing contact information—signed a pledge that promised they will avoid drugs, encourage their friends to do the same, and seek more information on the website.

Fialkoff says she removed that element because it had a religious aspect that didn’t belong in her secular program, but it is still sometimes used. At Lehman High School the parents and a few kids signed, though at Little Flower the forms stayed in the box.

The Foundation has responded to this article. Read their response here.

4 thoughts on “Questionable Claims by Anti-Drug Program

  1. Pingback: Scientology-Backed Anti-Drug Group Spreading Nonsense In NYC

  2. The program’s ties to Scientology are even more troubling than the article lets on. Scientology is an international criminal cult convicted of serious crimes virtually everywhere it operates (Eg. France’s high court ruled that the fundamental operation of Scientology is fraudulent). These “drug free” programs are designed to increase the potential source of victims for Scientology’s Narconon drug treatment, which is in fact Scientology indoctrination. Narconon is so dangerous that it’s Georgia facility was closed down after a patient death, and its flagship operation in Oklahoma is under criminal investigation and the subject of numerous lawsuits after three separate patient deaths. There are dozens of other lawsuits against Narconon detailing outright fraud and dangerous mistreatment of patients.

    The real lesson to learn is to just say NO to the Scientology front group Foundation for a Drug Free World.

  3. And if Tidman had deviated from the carefully secularized materials, that could be corrected, she added.

    Uh-oh. Tidman went off-script, and the real teachings of the Co$ slipped out when they shouldn’t. He’s in trouble now. He’s public, so I don’t think he’ll get the RPF, but I suspect he’s been through “security checks” by now. Poor guy.

  4. So Drug Free World’s presentation to school children is “secularized”? What would a non-secularized version contain? For the Church of Scientology, there would be no teachings about God (they have none). They might say drugs impede spiritual progress by making people harder to “audit” (their Church’s sole “spiritual” pursuit, consisting of hypnotic memory regression: “progress” consists of incorporating Hubbard’s “space opera” fiction into your own recalled past lives). But here is the key: they are lying when they say the presentation is completely secularized, because the “inaccuracies” that stubbornly persist in their scripts are articles of their faith! Hubbard said that drugs stay in your fat cells and cause flashbacks, therefore this is dogma to them. It would be a High Crime in their Church to change the script to include current scientifically-valid information (never mind logic; this is a cult).

    Is this harmful? The children get some inaccurate information about drugs, which they push to the backs of their minds before they reach the door. The Church gets a little more integrated into society, their Narconon program gains publicity, more addicts sign up for it, some are helped, many more are harmed, the Church gets richer and gains some recruits. Did anyone notice that the DFW presentation makes no distinction between illicit drugs and medical prescriptions? The Church forbids many medicines: psychiatric drugs are forbidden and auditing is denied to those who take even a headache pill. People have died trying to do without their prescriptions during courses of auditing. Parents have denied medical care to children: Hubbard said most diseases can be audited away, even leukemia.

    This “Church” is a dangerous cult. Do not allow them this “thin edge” by which to insert themselves into your schools.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.