Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

No Easy Answers as NYC Searches for Better Ways to Get Freight into a Crowded City

2 Comments

  • Larry Penner
    Posted August 21, 2019 at 10:15 am

    There is only $70 million for advancing an environmental study for the Cross Harbor Freight Tunnel within the Port Authority of NY & NJ 2017 – 2026 Capital Plan. This leaves a $9.930 billion shortfall to complete this project. Congress member Jerald Nadler claims that there is real progress for his favorite Cross Harbor Freight Tunnel project. He has championed this as his number one transportation priority for thirty years. After all that time, it is still in the federal National Environmental Protect Act review process. In theory, it might move thousands of trucks on a daily basis off the roads and on to railroad tracks for portions of the journey between New Jersey and Long Island. It reminds me of the long forgotten proposed tunnel between 69th Street in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn and St. George, Staten Island. The concept was to extend subway service from Brooklyn to Staten Island. Ground was broken with entrances at both ends in the 1920’s, but the project quickly ran out of money and was abandoned to history. Flash forward 90 years later and we have the proposed “Cross Harbor” rail freight tunnel project.

    Construction of any new freight, public transportation tunnel or bridge project can take years, if not decades, by the time all feasibility studies, environmental reviews, planning, design, engineering, real estate acquisition, permits, procurements, construction, budgeting, identifying and securing funding is completed. This is before the project reaches beneficial use. Construction for the 2nd Avenue subway began in the 1960’s. (Bond money intended for this project in the 1950’s was spent elsewhere.) The first segment was finally opened to the public on January 1, 2017 at a cost of $4.5 billion. Construction for the original tunnel to support bringing the LIRR from Queens into Grand Central Terminal began in the 1960’s. The latest completion date is now December 2022 with a current cost of $11.2 billion which could end up at $12 billion. No one can identify all the sources for the estimated $29 billion Gateway Tunnel. Ditto for paying back the $1.6 billion federal and $1 billion State Thruway Authority loans which covered a majority of the $4 billion new Tappan Zee Bridge. Who will find $10 billion or more needed for construction of a new Cross Harbor Freight Tunnel? Neither the Port Authority, Congressmember Nadler or Governor Cuomo have yet to identify and secure the billions needed to fund final design and engineering followed by construction. The Port Authority also needs to find $7 billion toward the $10 billion total cost for a new Port Authority Bus Terminal in Manhattan along with billions more for other transportation investments.

    There is also a potential serious conflict with the proposed several billion Triboro X (a new subway connecting the Bronx with Queens and Brooklyn). This route would run parallel from the Bay Ridge, Brooklyn terminus to Queens. This would result in serious operational conflicts between freight and subway trains. The proposed Cross Harbor Freight Tunnel may be just another in the continuing series of feasibility studies and environmental reviews sponsored by various governmental agencies and public officials over decades. They generate some money for consultants along with free publicity for elected officials who promise a bright future but all to often move on to another public office before delivering. Taxpayers are left holding an empty bag with unfilled promises.

    It is wishful thinking that the Port Authority can count on billions in future federal funding to make up the difference. Don’t be surprised in waiting another 30 years until future Port Authority ten year 2027 – 2036 and 2037 – 2046 Capital Plans are approved before a complete $10 billion or more funding package is in place necessary to support awarding construction contracts.

    Residents who oppose the project based on concerns about significant future increases in the number, length and frequency of freight trains need not worry. At the end of the day, just like the long abandoned Brooklyn to Staten Island subway – don’t count on seeing any shovel in the ground any time soon. You may never see completion of any Cross Harbor Freight Tunnel in their lifetime.

    (Larry Penner is a transportation historian, writer and advocate who previously worked 31 years for the United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Region 2 New York Office. This included the development, review, approval and oversight for billions in capital projects and programs for the MTA, NYC Transit, Long Island Rail Road, Metro North Rail Road MTA Bus, Nassau County NICE Bus, New Jersey Transit along with 30 other transit agencies in NY & NJ).

    .

  • Roland Lewis, President and CEO, Waterfront Alliance
    Posted August 27, 2019 at 2:56 pm

    Kudos to the authors of “No Easy Answers as NYC Searches for Better Ways to Get Freight into a Crowded City.” Trucking is the least efficient way to transport freight, and yet that’s what New York City is almost entirely dependent on. A shift to waterborne freight transit would use less fuel, produce less pollution, improve air quality, reduce costs, and lessen traffic congestion. Thankfully, New York City’s shipping industry leaders and elected officials recognize the need to return to our maritime roots, and are working to renovate waterfront terminals, construct barge landings, and engage with ports up and down the East Coast to energize the M95 Marine Highway Corridor. Congressman Nadler’s proposed Cross Harbor Freight Tunnel is making steady progress and is a viable long term solution, but in the meantime, let’s use the blue highway.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: