Skip to content Skip to footer

Opinion: It’s Time For a Late Checkout on NYC’s Airbnb Ban

“In New York, the hosts most impacted by Local Law 18 aren’t wealthy property magnates. They’re working families who rely on the supplemental income from short-term rentals to make mortgage payments, pay bills, and navigate the rising cost of living.

homes

Adi Talwar

Homes along Ridgewood Avenue and Cleveland Street in Brooklyn. The city launched a basement/cellar conversion pilot program in the area in 2019.

When New York City effectively banned short-term home rentals, the biggest winner was the hotel industry. Who were the losers? Just about everyone else.

Since Local Law 18 was enacted in 2023, the number of available short-term rental listings in New York City shrank by 92 percent. For a city grappling with a shortage of 227,000 homes, the ban was touted by its proponents as a silver bullet for solving New York’s housing affordability crisis. 

Now, 16 months later, New York housing prices haven’t budged. An analysis of preliminary evidence from New York shows that Local Law 18 has failed to ease rental costs or increase the supply of long-term housing.

The underwhelming data from New York isn’t just a fluke. Economic research further demonstrates the limited—and even harmful—impact of short-term rental restrictions on housing prices. In a piece for Harvard Business Review, a group of economists from Wharton, Harvard Business School, and Boston University noted that short-term rentals have a minimal impact on home prices and that short-term rentals can have a positive impact on local tourist economies.

Short-term rental bans aren’t effective as a tool to combat housing costs partly because the fraction of housing stock used for seasonal or recreational use is so small. The vast majority of hosts on platforms like Airbnb rent just one home

In New York, the hosts most impacted by Local Law 18 aren’t wealthy property magnates. They’re working families who rely on the supplemental income from short-term rentals to make mortgage payments, pay bills, and navigate the rising cost of living. Some Brooklyn homeowners reported a staggering 60 percent cut in monthly income since the restrictions took effect. Imagine losing more than half your paycheck in New York City, where prices are outpacing all other major American cities. 

It’s no surprise that the hotel industry championed Local Law 18—but even those same hoteliers could end up regretting the policy in the long run. Last September, the average price of a hotel room in New York City climbed to $417, the highest monthly rate ever recorded in the city. For a week-long vacation, that’s $2,919 spent on accommodations alone—67 percent more than the average American pays in rent

New York has always been a pricey travel destination, but it’s quickly becoming a place where only the wealthy can afford to visit. In the long term, that’s problematic for local businesses. Even a hotel developer expressed these concerns to the New York Times, describing how limited inventory could drive hotel rates so high that some tourists decide not to visit. 

It’s time for a wake-up call on Local Law 18. 

Luckily, the New York City Council recently introduced legislation to restore short-term rental rights to small, neighborhood homeowners. The amendments to Local Law 18 would apply only to registered one- and two-family homeowners who live in their homes and do not create any exemptions for investors, speculators, or entities buying or renting homes for short-term rental use. 

This legislation is a welcome pressure valve, offering some relief to both homeowners and tourists. City Council should work quickly to enact these amendments so they can turn their focus back to addressing New York’s housing crisis. 

It’s encouraging to see ambitious regulatory reform packages gain momentum in New York City, like the recently-passed City of Yes for Housing Opportunity, which aims to add 80,000 new homes over the next 15 years. That’s still not enough to close the city’s housing gap—but it’s a refreshing change of pace that brings New York one step closer to abundant affordable housing.

Adam Kovacevich is founder and CEO of the center-left tech industry coalition Chamber of Progress. Adam has worked at the intersection of tech and politics for 20 years, leading public policy at Google and Lime and serving as a Democratic Hill aide.

5 Comments

  • Tom Cayler
    Posted February 11, 2025 at 1:12 pm

    Contrary to Mr. Kovacevich’s claim . . . LL18 was not written to solve NYC’s housing problems.
    That would be City of Yes.
    LL18 was written to stop platforms like A’rb’b from operating illegal in NYC.
    Which it is successfully doing.
    https://skift.com/2025/02/05/nyc-enforcement-boss-on-short-term-rental-law-its-working-exclusive/
    In it’s original draft, 1107 would have allowed every 1- and 2-family home in NYC to become a permanent STR. 1- and 2-family homes represent 29% of NYC’s housing stock, and 14% of the city’s rental stock.
    Now this bill has been amended and not even it’s backers support it any more.
    Mr. Kovacevich is also incorrect when he claims w/out evidence that LL18 was sponsored by the hotel industry.
    It was not.
    I, a simple citizen, wrote the first draft of that bill Intro 2309 that became LL18.
    Intro 2309 was sponsored and supported by housing advocates and neighborhood groups.
    If Mr. Kovacevich wants to further enrich A’rb’b, that’s his right, but he should get his facts right, too.
    Tom Cayler
    Coalition Against Illegal Hotels
    Hell’ Kitchen, NY

    • Tim
      Posted February 12, 2025 at 8:21 pm

      Like most of the people on the wrong side of this issue, Tom is conflating 1- and 2-family short-term rentals with the affordable housing crisis. Notwithstanding that LL18 is forcing people out of their homes, this is a mistake that only benefits two camps: hotel shareholders and scolds.

      As Tom is well aware, not all 1- and 2-family homeowners want to or can host short-term rentals, so 14% of the city’s “rental stock” is not in danger of leaving the rental market, especially since a portion of those units could not be rented under 1107, as they are not owner-occupied. Tom’s misdirection here is transparent to anyone actually invested in this issue.

      The impact LL18 has had on my family? A loss of freedom (our friends and family cannot visit us comfortably) and ~$500/month in income. The impact of allowing 1- and 2-family homeowners (who want to) to rent short-term? Negligible. According to a Harvard Business Review study, even before 10,000 short-term rentals were banned, they increased the median rent in the city only about $125/year. Our family alone lost $6,000 to LL18 last year. Many others have sold their homes or gone into foreclosure. Tom wants to rob Peter to pay Paul—fleece middle-class homeowners for the sake of marginal gains for renters (and massive gains for hoteliers).

      No one thinks tenement “hotels” were a good thing, but LL18 was a massive overreach—that the hotel lobby promoted and cashed in on—and is now causing foreclosures and housing precarity. The city needs 50,000 new units *every year* to get ahead of its housing shortage, but Tom and his allies in the hotel lobby would prefer to attack homeowners instead of, say, converting empty hotel rooms and office real estate into apartments.

      The punitive aspect is the real appeal for them—the cruelty is the point.

      Tim Eliot
      Actual homeowner
      Kingsbridge, The Bronx

  • Tom Cayler
    Posted February 13, 2025 at 2:00 pm

    Tim:
    Thanks for your insight.
    Do you support the amended Intro 1107?
    Does it give you what you want?

    Tom Cayler
    Coalition Against Illegal Hotels
    Hell’s Kitchen

  • Tim
    Posted February 13, 2025 at 7:43 pm

    The amended version, Intro 1107-A, is not clear—the language in the first sections allowing short-term rentals for owner-occupied 1- and 2-family homes has been removed. Until that’s restored, I cannot support it.

  • Tom Cayler
    Posted February 14, 2025 at 8:48 am

    So what legislation are you supporting now?

    tom

Leave a comment

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: