Share This Article
Mayor Zohran Mamdani pledged to expand eligibility for city housing vouchers according to City Council laws that his predecessor failed to implement. Faced with steep fiscal challenges, he said the city is now pursuing a settlement that balances housing needs and budget sustainability.

The Mamdani administration is backtracking on a campaign commitment to expand eligibility for the city’s housing voucher program.
Advocates have been calling for the new mayor to implement an expansion of the City Fighting Homelessness and Eviction Prevention Supplement (CityFHEPS) program that would enable people with higher incomes and people facing eviction to get rental subsidies.
The City Council passed the expansion in 2023, only for former Mayor Eric Adams to refuse to implement it. The Council then sued. Mamdani pledged to drop the suit during his campaign.
But facing a budget deficit, the expansion’s future became cloudy last month, as City Limits reported. On Thursday, the administration said it was pursuing a settlement in the case, rather than dropping it, as Mamdani had pledged while running for office.
“We got the promise of how this is going to be a new era in City Hall and in New York City, but it feels like the mayor is replicating similar failures from previous administrations in not really being bold and centering solutions … that can actually help us put a dent on the mass homelessness crisis,” said Adolfo Abreu, housing campaigns director at VOCAL-NY, a group that organizes with people in shelters.
The Mamdani administration is feeling the pressure of balancing its first budget, which has a $7 billion deficit. CityFHEPS currently serves over 65,000 households—making it the second largest voucher program in the country. Its budget soared to $1.25 billion last fiscal year, a five-fold increase since 2021.
Comptroller Mark Levine estimated that implementing the Council’s expansion would increase the budget deficit by $6 to $20 billion in the next five years.
“Right now we are pursuing a settlement in this case and that is a pursuit that looks to both prevent homelessness in our city while also delivering a budget that is not just responsible, but also sustainable,” said Mayor Mamdani in response to a question about the expansion Thursday morning.
Under the program, voucher holders—usually people leaving city homeless shelters—pay 30 percent of their income in rent, with the voucher covering the remainder. Supporters say the expansion would help prevent homelessness before it starts and move vulnerable New Yorkers into housing.
The appeals court ruled that the mayor had to implement the expansion (a move Mamdani applauded at the time), only for the Adams administration to appeal it again.
Christine Quinn, CEO of Women in Need (WIN), which operates homeless shelters for families with children, was optimistic about Mamdani’s stance on vouchers when she spoke with City Limits a few weeks ago. She was disappointed to see the mayor walking it back.
“CityFHEPS is a proven program that has allowed thousands of New Yorkers to leave shelter for good. Amid a persistent homelessness crisis, we are asking Mayor Mamdani to honor his promise to drop the City’s legal challenge to CityFHEPS expansion and to provide a clear timeline for seeing this expansion through,” said Quinn in a statement to City Limits.
Women in Need released a report Thursday arguing that fully implementing the expansion would save the city $635 million by offsetting shelter costs. The report disputes claims by the Citizens Budget Commission, which highlighted the fast-growing budget for the program.
Councilmember Crystal Hudson, a member of the Council’s Progressive Caucus, also came out against Mamdami’s decision: “I am deeply disappointed by the Mayor’s reversal on implementing City law to expand CityFHEPS eligibility,” she said in a statement. “Affordability was a central campaign promise for the mayor, and expanding housing vouchers is one of the clearest ways to make good on that promise.”
It’s unclear what a settlement might look like, and what it means for the cost of the program and those potentially eligible.
“We need leadership that’s able to say, ‘This is the plan for how we’re going to ensure that we’re, one, creating pathways for people out of homelessness,'” said Abreu. “And, more important for us—the expansion is crucial in this—providing support for people so they don’t have to become homeless in the first place.”
Edward Josephson, a lawyer for the Legal Aid Society working on the Council lawsuit, said Mamdani’s decision will only lead to further delays. “Meanwhile all the people in eviction proceedings that would have been covered by this law will not be,” he said.
Here’s what else happened in housing this week—
ICYMI, from City Limits:
- Tenants who get affordable housing through the city’s lottery or a rental assistance voucher often can’t afford amenity fees in new mixed-income luxury buildings, creating what one described as a “two-tiered system” within New York City rentals.
- Are you a renter with a complaint? The city wants to hear from you. Here’s what you need to know about attending the mayor’s “Rental Ripoff” hearings, which kick off Feb. 26.
ICYMI, from other local newsrooms:
- The mayor has promised repeatedly to crackdown on bad landlords. But he’s spoken little about NYCHA—which he now oversees—where tenants have long faced deteriorating conditions, the New York Times reports.
- Mamdani’s new housing commissioner is a renter herself, and THE CITY detailed her search to find an apartment in the five boroughs.
- Gothamist reports on the New Yorkers who lost their lives during the recent extreme cold, several of whom had housing at the time of their deaths.
- New York’s housing shortage has consequences beyond sky-high rents: the state could lose seats in Congress as its population shrinks, New York Focus reports.
- Happy Valentines Day: Meet the two married New Yorkers who were set up by their doorman, via the New York Post.
To reach the reporter behind this story, contact [email protected]. To reach the editor, contact [email protected]
Want to republish this story? Find City Limits’ reprint policy here.

6 Comments
Tracey Cid
Here we go with the Bullshit and this is coming from a employee at NYC HRA. They got rid of Moly Mascow the current Adam’s appointed stooge. After the MTA, NYCHRA is the most mismanaged agency.
Homeless New Yorker
I’ve heard that Corrections is the most dysfunctional NYC agency (now run by a federal receiver), and DHS the second. NYC DHS is part of Molly Wasow Park’s DSS. The other part, the HRA, is probably not much better.
MC
In addition to considering tax increases, the City should actively partner with New York’s leading philanthropic donors to help stabilize our housing system. Strategic philanthropic investment could provide immediate relief by funding housing vouchers during this period of fiscal constraint, while also supporting a long-term, independent think tank charged with developing actionable roadmaps to address low-income housing needs over the next 20 years. While taxation is one tool for addressing budget deficits, it does not solve the structural problem that our current housing strategies are moving too slowly to keep pace with widening income inequality. If individuals and institutions hold such a significant share of the City’s wealth, there is both an opportunity and a responsibility for them to contribute—not only financially, but intellectually—to building sustainable, scalable solutions for the future.
This is not about charity replacing government, nor about absolving public institutions of their responsibility. It is about recognizing that if extreme concentrations of private wealth and extreme public need coexist in the same city—then closing this gap requires targeted strategic partnership. If our current housing strategies are moving at a pace that cannot keep up with widening inequality, then we must bring more resources, more talent, and more urgency to the table.