Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

There Was a Dramatic Rewriting of the Rent Laws. What’s the Impact Been?

5 Comments

  • Nadia
    Posted October 2, 2019 at 5:12 pm

    The results are devastating already. NYC is over they had two decades and then they pulled the strings too far. These so-called lawmakers have no idea what the business entails. They have essentially killed value and quality of life for all NYC residents for generations to come, and killing tax revenue and city services. They all need to be prosecuted for genocide.

  • Gemma Seymour
    Posted October 3, 2019 at 4:13 pm

    It is far too early to tell anything substantive. We know that rent control over the long term reduces housing availability and forces not rent-controlled tenants to subsidise those who already have secure tenancy. Rent control is absolutely the opposite of what the housing market needs. Rent control privileges past and existing uses of land at the expense of potential future uses and current and future needs. It ultimately drives quality down and price up, but that doesn’t happen in only three months.

    Land values are a function of the demand for the use of valuable locations, and we as a society should not want rents to be kept low; rather, we should want rents to rise to the maximum the market can bear, and the surplus value of location privilege to be equitably distributed by reclaiming that value for the community.

    Rent control is always bad because it distorts the market for the use of land by artificially limiting the price of using land. Land values are determined by aggregate demand, and the only way that land tenure can be efficiently allocated is if rents are allowed to rise to whatever price the market will bear.

    Rising rents induce increases of supply which lower rents. Artificially limiting rents limits supply, which raises rents. Artificially limiting building limits supply, which raises rents.
    The only people who think rent control is a good idea are people who don’t understand elementary economic principles like supply and demand.

    • Jarrett Murphy
      Posted October 4, 2019 at 11:18 am

      Land is a natural monopoly–even in a vertical city, there are limits to how much supply can be created. The rules of supply and demand don’t apply nearly as perfectly as you’re suggesting.

  • The Overlord
    Posted October 3, 2019 at 7:45 pm

    All the tenants will yell and scream for even lower rents.
    Tenants have no idea how much it costs to operate and maintain an apartment
    building in NYC. It benefits zero existing tenants that vacancy decontrol ended. Zilch.
    In Manhattan, where stabilized rents are often 1/3rd of market rents, vacated apartments
    will not be renovated and rented. Landlords will just wait for better times.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: