Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Opinion: Gowanus Needs Green Space. Let’s Work Together to Save Public Place Park

7 Comments

  • M
    Posted December 3, 2020 at 5:35 pm

    This is the best and most reasonable proposal for land use of public place. The proposed alternative of housing people on toxic land , land whose remediation will be minimal is frightening. Given the terrible situation at Peter Cooper Village, in Manhattan which was built on a far less toxic waste dump, this alternative is superior.

  • MM
    Posted January 11, 2021 at 12:35 am

    I agree completely with the authors. The gowanus will be developed, and rezoned, hopefully in a smart and sustainable way, but we know that doesn’t always happen. we need to protect every last bit of land already reserved for open space. This seems like a no-brainer. It will add all of the benefits mentioned by the authors while also increasing value and livability for all in the area.
    Have you reached out to other developers in the area to perhaps have them throw some weight behind this? I don’t see why they would want additional housing and pass up a city-funded open space park to increase value for their investments.

  • Spencer Heckwolf
    Posted January 11, 2021 at 5:23 am

    Thank you for bring this to our attention.

    Since It has been determined that Public Place has been documented as the most polluted site in the entire State of NY and even EPA has recently spoke in length about the toxic waste that will be still there even after National Grid is done with their limited clean up of the site, building a park is by far the best use of the land!

    Besides, who in their right mind would want to build apartments and a school on this site knowing that beneath are cancer causing toxins that will eventually seep into those structures? Who will be responsible when the residents and school kids develop health issues and even cancer being exposed to the toxic mess beneath those buildings?

  • N
    Posted January 11, 2021 at 9:38 am

    As we’ve experienced over the last year, public open space is not a nice-to-have. It’s a have-to-have. It is part of the foundation of the social and environmental fabric of creating strong communities.

    There is (and will be) plenty of room for new housing throughout Gowanus.
    Assuring that a significant portion of it is affordable can be accomplished in other ways. Government and developers valuing our City’s shrinking open space not only benefits our health and well being, it’s also a sound investment.

  • Rob
    Posted January 11, 2021 at 9:39 am

    Tell me they are kidding. Please.
    On the one patch of land in our already congested and underserved (transit, schools and green space) neighborhood, they want to build housing on a toxic site? Given the proposed rezoning of the entire area (and the likelihood of vastly increased residential and commercial development) this sounds like a magnificent opportunity to build much needed green space which our elected officials in their infinite wisdom would prefer to squander. We need more affordable, up to date, energy efficient and beautiful housing for sure, but we will never find public owned open space such as this in our lifetime.
    There are plenty of sites which can be made available for the expansion of public and private housing within the proposed rezoning limits. Parks and green spaces, along with tree lined streets add immeasurable value to neighborhoods, lifestyle and teal estate values.
    Can we really afford not to build a park?

  • Michael
    Posted January 12, 2021 at 2:07 pm

    Green space yes please! Gowanus already has a few gargantuan new apartment complexes do we really need more? No! We need a park to be healthy and exercise and have community.

  • Georges n
    Posted January 14, 2021 at 9:05 pm

    Building yet more buildings in a congested area with limited services is simply ridiculous. We do not need yet more buildings, a doubling of the residents in the neighborhood, more traffic and strained services such as sewers and public transportation. The park proposal is a real opportunity to do something good for the community and nearby neighborhoods. It would be nice to see our elected officials supporting a quality of life initiative rather than the agenda of developers who just want to make money and who will not live in the mess they leave behind.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: