Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Lawmakers: Axe Tax Break for High-End Condos and Coops to Help Fund NYCHA

4 Comments

  • redbike
    Posted April 8, 2019 at 3:38 pm

    Two parts to this comment: First, you can’t pull on one thread of NYC’s real estate tax scheme without finding it’s inextricably linked to other stuff. Specific to this story, NYC’s residential co-ops and condos currently are assessed as though they were rental units. They’re distinctly different critters. Eliminating this link might, in a limited way, lead to more logical assessed values. And yes, then tax higher-valued units at a higher rate.

    Second, specific to finding funding sources (plural) for NYCHA, eliminate the current subsidy for car parking at NYCHA buildings. Charge market rates.

  • Dave
    Posted April 9, 2019 at 6:36 pm

    Charging a higher rate for NYCHA apartments in highly prized locations in Manhattan would be a start.
    Then, selling off part of that land and building market rate apartments would be next.

    • Post Author
      Jarrett Murphy
      Posted April 10, 2019 at 7:49 am

      Interesting. Why would we charge low-income who happen to be in a Manhattan location more? That kind of goes against the whole idea of public housing, doesn’t it?

  • Javiel Sepulveda
    Posted September 7, 2020 at 2:27 pm

    The MTA has been the agency that receives the most funding from the city; Although, it has it’s own revenue collection. Make MTA open its books to public review and approval.
    The MTA is a valuable city asset for transporting people and their spending dollars. Public Housing is viewed as an expense without return. The law states that all municipal agencies must be funded. The Public Housing Residents have just not found their voice to demand, equity in funding. We should sue the state as was done to restore money to the Public schools.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: