Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Plan to House Formerly-Incarcerated Inches Forward in the East Bronx

4 Comments

  • JustHome Supporter
    Posted December 14, 2023 at 1:42 pm

    It’s very disheartening to see the amount of bigotry and just outright hatred on display at every one of these meetings. Just try having some empathy. I hope this project goes through and is a huge success that helps many vulnerable people!

    • Joseph G Vaini
      Posted December 18, 2023 at 5:40 pm

      One area of major concern with “Just Home” is the fact that neither severity of offense or criminal history (including but not limited to acts of violence or crimes against children) will disqualify any former inmate from tenancy. Screening will be performed solely by the Fortune Society and tenancy will be granted solely at the discretion of the Fortune Society.

      During a public meeting on Just Home residents were made aware of the story of Roderick Compass. Mr. Compass was a landlord who rented an apartment in his Springfield Garden Queens home to the Fortune Society. The Fortune Society then housed Sylvia Cruz and Jason Hermidas, a formerly incarcerated couple, in that apartment.

      Many of us saw the media stories of how Ms. Cruz and Mr. Hermidas trashed the apartment they were placed in and the problems they gave Mr. Compass. But there is one part of this story that didn’t receive the coverage that the trashing of this apartment received. Mr. Hermidas, who was placed in an apartment in the same home as Compass’ two young daughters, is a registered sex offender.

      How effective can the Fortune Society’s screening process be if it can result in the placing of a registered sex offender in the same home as two young children?

      There have been far better uses proposed for the Just Home building besides housing dedicated for former Rikers inmates. Veteran’s housing and senior housing have been proposed. Affordable housing for Jacobi employees has been proposed. All alternatives far more palatable and far less risky for the community.

      When this proposal was first disclosed to the public NYCHH and Fortune indicated that tenants would be gravely ill and practically at death’s door. We learned later on such presentations were misleading and that was not to be the case. The inmate tenants may not be as gravely ill as described and may include those suffering from mental illness and substance addiction.

      If HHC and the city are dead set against housing veterans or seniors in these apartments and this building must hold former Rikers inmates then Fortune and HHC should at the very least agree to be bound to do the following:
      Restrict tenancy to persons suffering from a clearly defined list of conditions (e.g. end stage renal failure, stage 4 cancer) and a clearly defined level of severity giving preference to former Rikers detainees meeting the above criteria.

  • Joseph G Vaini
    Posted December 15, 2023 at 12:57 pm

    This project is intended to provide housing for former Rikers’ detainees with “complex medical needs”. The principals of this project have repeatedly described prospective tenants as those who “may” have conditions such as advanced cancers or end stage renal disease or who “may” be nonambulatory however no strict definition of what constitutes “complex medical needs” as it pertains to this project was disclosed. “Complex medical needs” and “Medically complex conditions” are vague umbrella terms which can have different meanings depending upon context and program. The generally accepted definition is that these terms refer to conditions that are persistent, substantially disabling or life threatening, and that require treatments and interventions across a broad scope of medical, social, and mental health services. The term could refer to a person with end stage renal disease or it could just as easily apply to someone with hypertension and an enlarged prostate. The latest FAQ released by NYCHH confirmed that substance abuse and mental health issues will not serve as a bar to tenancy.

    The principals of this project were asked if those incarcerated for certain heinous crimes or who had a history of certain heinous crimes (e.g. crimes against children) would be ineligible for tenancy in the building. The response to that concern is that that prospective tenants would be screened however there would be no blanket exceptions to eligibility. The events experienced by Mr. Ronald Compass ( who had his home destroyed and whose wife was assaulted by a Fortune Society client) illustrate how fallible such a screening process can be.

    Finally The Fortune Society has been actively lobbying to eliminate practically all NYS registration requirements and residency restrictions on sex offenders. These safeguards are already notoriously weak in NYS and the developers of Just Home would like to weaken them even further. Fortune is also lobbying for the City and State to reward landlords who agree to house convicted sex offenders. It’s reasonable for the families living within close proximity to Just Home to be concerned

    If both of NYCHH and the Fortune Society were being honest with the community tenancy would be restricted solely to those suffering from a clearly defined list of conditions (e.g. end stage renal failure, stage 4 cancer) and a clearly defined level of severity.

  • Elaine Young
    Posted December 18, 2023 at 11:09 am

    In Fresh Meadows, Queens, we have formerly incarcerated individuals housed in a hotel for more than 3 years. This program was put into place with ZERO notification to the commmunity. In the beginning it was said to implemented to keep those individuals safe from COVID which they would not be in the congregant prison setting. After the end of the pandemic, the program remained in place. The first provider was Exodus, with a very checkered history and they were ousted. Now it is Housing Works. A long term contract has been signed, again, with ZERO community input. The local CVS – directly behind the hotel – is continually shoplifted by the residents of this hotel. A new supermarket is scheduled to open in the same shopping center – we worry they will be continually shoplifted as well. There are currently 3 registered sex offenders housed in the hotel. At least one is a Level 3 offender, convicted of 1st degree rape and kidnapping of a 16 year old girl. Housing Works seems to know next to nothing about the individuals supposedly under their “care”. The Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice continually lies to us and does the opposite of what they say they will. The way our community feels about this program foisted upon us has nothing to do with “bigotry and hatred” as one of the commenters suggested. It has to do with the safety of the residents and businesses in our community. We have every right to be concerned!!!!

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: