Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Opinion: Congestion Pricing is a Step Forward for NYC

7 Comments

  • stan chaz
    Posted March 28, 2024 at 9:02 am

    Call it what it really is: suicidal, strangulation pricing.
    We will be replacing the healthy congestion
    that is the hallmark of a bustling-growing-thriving-open&inviting city
    with the slow strangulation & self-suicide of a closed & dying city,
    This, as our commerce, our entertainment options,
    our very freedom of movement ….is strangled.
    Congestion pricing is the very embodiment
    of the mindless MAGA mantra of building walls,
    as we balkanize & divide & destroy this city…..

  • Ali
    Posted March 28, 2024 at 7:58 pm

    Dear Mr. Lyon,
    I am a 4th generation New Yorker – don’t even know how to drive.
    My family walks and uses bus and subway.

    And am completely against Congestion Pricing.
    There are so many reasons it is doubtful that City Limits would allow me the space.

    But to note just a few issues:
    The stated purpose of CP is for revenue for the MTA for capital – CP will not reduce fares. and CP will not help bus service which the MTA keeps cutting.
    There are many non-rich people who drive (it particularly concerns me that a Alabama transplant feels entitled to pass judgement here) – for example, they live far away without access to reliable mass transit, may have night shifts etc.
    Most vehicles are commercial – not personal.
    The City continues to enable/allow/create more and new congestion including: shrinking street space, closing streets. adding bike lanes, unfettered luxury high rise development, unfettered Uber, explosion in Amazon/ecommerce and more.
    CP will quicken the gentrification tsunami.

    CP is not meant to further or justify bicycling.
    Bicycling does not reduce vehicles. In fact, bicycling does siphon from bus and subway use.
    NYC bicyclists routinely go through red lights, go the wrong way, ignore bike lanes and are overall egregious in their disregard for pedestrians

    Relatives and friends have been hit by bicyclists – Citibike, racing bicyclists, food delivery workers.

    As an authentic New Yorker, the last thing I want is ” a city where riding a bicycle or other micro-mobility device is not only safe, but seen as the norm”

  • Susan Simon
    Posted March 28, 2024 at 8:13 pm

    There’s an old expression that goes something like, “please don’t pee on my head and tell me it’s raining”. That is the condition we find ourselves in now in NY. Our streets have been very poorly redesigned by a non-transparent autocratic DOT to greatly accommodate bike lanes used by a minority of New Yorkers, along with other things like Citibike platforms and Open Streets which actually closes streets. And everyone is wondering why the traffic is so bad? Hence the old expression.

    If you cut down 4 lanes to 2 or even 1, traffic is going to be bad. If you bring in tens of thousands of for hire Lyfts and Ubers, traffic is going to be even worse! And then if you bring in 65,000 unregulated e-vehicle delivery guys it’s going to be pandemonium. Which is what we now have. And the solution? Charge people so there’s less bad traffic!
    This is a situation foisted on the public without their ability to do anything at all about it! Protests, petitions, and cries at community boards and at City Hall fall on deaf ears. The public realm has been ceded to private companies so that even walking is an issue now. Perhaps the city and state will move to charge us to do that too.
    As for other modes of transit, I for one no longer take the subway or taxis either. The subways are far too unsafe particularly since lithium-battery e-bikes ride on them blessed by the MTA. They are combustible as witnessed by many of us forced to live with them on our streets and in our buildings. It’s a matter of time til there is a deadly fire in the subway because of them. And while e-bikes were invited on by the MTA, some of the other problems perhaps were not. Daily there are incidents often by the mentally ill as well as plain ol’ criminals either pushing people onto the tracks or robbing them. No thanks. I’m done with the MTA and their sadly managed industry and poor judgment.
    Another mode of transportation taxis have become far too expensive and even drivers will tell you that. And that’s before an increase for congestion pricing (even though there already is an increase for cp). It is now $10 just to get in a cab and go nowhere. So as a middle class New Yorker my options and my freedoms have become less and less while my taxes have sky-rocketed.
    This is no longer a city for the working class, the middle class and the upper middle class and I can only construe from all of this that more and more of us will be pushed out of here. Unless you are in a rent-stabilized apartment you will find it very difficult to continue to pay the increased costs. Because surely when trucks and cars are forced to pay hefty fees, they will transfer those fees to you and me in the form of food, clothing and the things we require in order to live. It’s a deal breaker.
    A livable city?? Not from where I sit. And I hardly think I’m alone.

  • Corey Bearak
    Posted March 29, 2024 at 12:14 am

    No one disputes the need to build and maintain an effective public transit system serving 22.2 million residents in the largest and most economically significant metropolitan region in the United States with more than 10.7 million jobs. The focus must be (1) identifying equitable, fair and sustainable resources and (2) impacts of any resource plan.
    By every measure this regressive, inequitable, unfair and unsustainable congestion toll-tax scheme fails on every level.
    Despite its name it achieves nothing of any consequence with relieving congestion.
    It even falls short of its claims concerning the environment; instead it negatively impacts public health.
    Moreover, its implementation will increase everyday costs of goods and services for small businesses and all New Yorkers whether they take public transit, ride a bike, walk, rely on for hire vehicles or drive a car.
    It remains the most inefficient and uncertain source of revenue.
    The best path remains canning this toll-tax scheme and identifying other resources not reliant on any net revenue scheme.
    This scheme remains the brainchild of some misguided folks who fixate on eliminating passenger cars in Manhattan, mostly south of 60th Street by imposing a tax on entry that effectively eliminates all but the uber-wealthy if this toll-tax scheme that requires a net revenue ultimately prevails. This congestion pricing scheme is nothing more than a handout to hedge fund-supported Uber and Lyft and its wealthiest riders at the expense of lower income and minority New Yorkers, many living in transit deserts.
    Its misguided adoption during the 2019 state budget process involved funding massive borrowing to help someone – no longer in public office – become the second coming of Robert Moses.
    Key Pints:
    The MTA Failed to Consider Other, Better Sources of Funding
    The Toll-Tax Scheme Fails to Protect Public Health & the Environment
    Rather than Spur Growth, the Toll-Tax Can Kill the Economy
    The Congestion Tax is a Regressive, Unfair & Inequitable Tax
    It is a Non-Factor in Relieving Congestion
    So we are left with a phony plan that irresponsibly uses falsehoods about congestion reduction and the environment to support a regressive, inequitable, unfair and unsustainable toll- tax.
    The best path remains to acknowledge this plan fails on every level and to recommend what works.

  • Ali
    Posted March 30, 2024 at 9:36 am

    Adding to my previous comment…

    It continues to be incredible that affluent people who’ve moved to NYC from “suburban” or car dependent areas, people who’ve contributed to NYC gentrification, feel entitled to denounce vehicle users in NYC.

    Conveniently, their older or ill relatives are back in the suburbs and get driven around.

    Perhaps City Limits can reach out to Mr. Lyon and ask him to detail who cares for his older and ill relatives – and if that includes driving?

  • Jon
    Posted March 30, 2024 at 7:46 pm

    No – Congestion Pricing is not for bicycling.

  • Rick Horan
    Posted April 2, 2024 at 2:54 pm

    City and State politicians and the MTA say congestion pricing will improve outer-borough transit so motorists can ditch their cars. But actions speak louder than words.

    The Rockaway Beach Branch is an unused transit right of way and Queens’ only north-south rail corridor. It’s located between the infamously congested Woodhaven Boulevard and Van Wyck Expressway. Reactivating it for subway use is a huge opportunity to reconnect south Queens with the rest of the City and get motorists to ditch their cars for cleaner subways.

    The MTA predicted 47,000 daily riders would enjoy reduced commuting time, and have better access to jobs, education, and recreation, essential for the disadvantaged families at the end of the line who need it most.

    Instead, the MTA has done everything possible to prevent this capital project from ever happening. The Mayor has sold out to special interests who have decided that south Queens commuters should not have their rail line reconnected, but continue to take a 2-hour bus ride to and from central Queens and midtown Manhattan. To ensure there is no hope of ever reactivating this line, he has committed $35 million of City funds and $117 million in federal funds to build his skinny park. Keeping communities of color poor is not as cheap as it used to be.

    The City and State will continue struggling to sell congestion pricing to outer borough commuters until they put our money where their mouth is.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: