Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Opinion: Unfairness and Opacity Surround a Tree Planting in the Bronx

6 Comments

  • Naomi Zürcher, Urban Forester / Consulting Arborist
    Posted February 8, 2020 at 8:30 am

    Thank you, Friends of Pelham Parkway, for being vocal tree advocates. If you are an urban tree, residing anywhere in NYC but especially in underserved, disenfranchised communities, you have much to be concerned about so having community advocates is critical to an urban tree’s existence. What Parks is not including in their promise of a “thriving tree canopy…” is that this is determined by the way in which the planting site is prepared, the amount of rootable soil which will be afforded the trees being planted, the quality and appropriateness of the trees being selected for planting, the level of Best Management Practices incorporated into each and every tree planting as well as establishment period criteria including irrigation and mulching. The devils is always in the details and it’s a rare part of NYC’s tree canopy that could be said to be “thriving”. The state of our urban trees bears witness to the gross incompetence exhibited by Parks as the official entity responsible for this invaluable public resource – our urban trees.

  • Cynthia Salett
    Posted February 8, 2020 at 10:27 am

    Once again the city makes blanket statements devoid of any connection to the reality of situations they create and the communities they affect. Who is working for whom?? NYC government agencies are supposed to be serving the communities not the other way around! It is time for us all to get up and speak out. If we join together in demanding our government represent us and not just billionaire developers maybe we can take back our city and our parks. The people of Pelham Park, fighting for their green spaces, are true heroes!!

  • Nature’s Nurses
    Posted February 8, 2020 at 4:00 pm

    That’s great! When we take action things get done!

  • Roxanne Delgado
    Posted February 10, 2020 at 4:14 pm

    Those numbers are not exact, what parks fails to state is that many of those trees will be east of Wiliamsbridge Road and not even on the parkway but as street trees. Also they removed 77 trees from the north side which is void of trees in the 1st place and they now will use our monies to plant elsewhere. NYC Parks forestry fails the community. We have over 4 trees planted next to or even on top of existing trees. They neglect our trees on the North side and now take away our replacement trees for the homeowners. Environment Discrimination exist in our own backyard. Our residents want and deserve to be made whole again and we want native trees that add to the biodiversity and brings nature to our strip of green space between the thruway. Yet they dump ornamental inexpensive tress and plant the oak and tulip tress just across the corresponding street on the south side.

    And Nave Strauss in charge of street trees are so arrogant and nasty at the meeting. Yet he makes over 90k yet the street trees in the Bronx are in poor conditions. They are either planted in the wrong location, or they are not maintained.

    It is sad when the people who claim to be expert on trees have NO love for trees. We have a tough fight ahead and we may most likely lost but we wont be silence.

  • Adam wolf
    Posted February 12, 2020 at 1:04 am

    What was is no more.
    If the people in the neighborhood voted like in the past the politicians wouldn’t let this happen

  • Roxanne Delgado
    Posted February 14, 2020 at 7:33 pm

    “332 trees will be planted on Pelham Parkway—221 on the north side and 121 on the south side. ”

    NYC Parks numbers are INCORRECT. 221 plus 121 does not equal 332 and the amount is way less for the North side east of Williamsbridge Road

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: