Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Opinion: The Rent Regs Debate is About Giving Tenants the Tools to Fight

4 Comments

  • Maine
    Posted May 16, 2019 at 10:28 am

    Why have 3 kids if you can barely afford rent?

    I have no children for that very reason, kids are expensive.

    Good cause eviction has too many gapping holes. Renters are temporary and have no ownership therefore should not be entitled to stay in 1 place forever. The owner should have the control, placing that control in the tenants is backwards. If people think low income below market rate housing is bad now, watch how worse it get of everyone of these bills passed.

  • nyc homeowner
    Posted May 16, 2019 at 4:43 pm

    I sympathize with you but it sounds like you have a bad landlord. Most unregulated units are in 2 or 3 family homes are private homes which should not be regulated like larger apartment buildings. A 2 or 3 family home is not a business, an apartment building is a business. Why don’t you move? I’m sure you can find a better apartment with a better landlord.

  • Despina
    Posted May 17, 2019 at 4:35 pm

    I’ve owned and lived in a lovely two family house in Brooklyn for thirty one years, and when I was renting the garden apartment (and thereafter) always kept it in great condition, and addressed any required repairs immediately. Having been an oppressed tenant prior to buying the house, I was very mindful of my obligations and determined to be a good landlord. Then several years ago I rented to a tenant who, I discovered after she had moved in, had provided fraudulent documents to the broker, and had established a pattern of paying rent for four months maximum and then screaming all night, accusing next door neighbors of being peeping toms, etc., and eventually doing her best, while in eviction proceedings, to extort her landlord(s) for as much as she could get out of them to move on, always demanding a letter of recommendation to her next victim as part of the settlement. While we were in L/T court, she attempted to kill me by turning on all the burners of her stove in winter, blowing out the pilot light, and leaving the house. The only reason I’m alive is that my next door neighbor smelled the gas through the party wall. The court wouldn’t permit me to introduce evidence of attempted murder, as our local precinct, wanting to keep its crime stats down, accepted her explanation that it was all a mistake…her cat had turned on the stove. Did I mention that she turned out to have a police record for assault and battery on her prior landlord? I negotiated her down to a buyout price I could live with, refused to give her a letter of recommendation, and haven’t rented that apartment since. If these laws had been in effect at that time, I would have had to spend even more time risking my life by living in my own house while trying to secure evidence to prove to a court that she had tried to kill me. “Good cause” sounds nice, but having to prove “cause” to the satisfaction of a court while one’s life is in jeopardy is not my idea of fun. Not all tenants are oppressed saints, and not all landlords are evil. And no matter what my financial situation, that apartment is off the market until I leave feet first.

  • Kara Kasper
    Posted June 12, 2019 at 6:46 am

    Respectfully, this story is either political fabricated or just entirely confused. The “Good Cause” bill is trying to regulate apartments in very small buildings of 1-3 units that are NOT currently under any regulation. There would never be this kind of tension in a unregulated unit because an owner in an unregulated building has the right to not renew a lease.

    If the landlord here in this building is trying to evict Jorge… and or using unscrupulous tactics like failing to repair a unit to drive him out… Then Jorge doesn’t live in the type of unit that would be impacted by “Good Cause”. He already lives in a regulated unit.

    “Good Cause” should of course be rejected because small owners in 1 and 2 families… even the owner of just a single condo somewhere should obviously not be subjected to the same controls as institutional landlords in 200 unit buildings. It would close off entry level investments to the middle class in NY entirely. And moreover, there is no demonstrable problem with aggressive owners of 2 family buildings.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: