Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Opinion: New York’s Police Secrecy Law Endangers Our Communities

3 Comments

  • Raanan Geberer
    Posted June 16, 2019 at 10:18 am

    As a former NYCHA employee, I read this piece with alarm. If secrecy goes for police, it will soon go for every single muncipal, state or federal employee. I sure wouldn’t want my personnel records as a former NYCHA employee to be made public there may be some things in there that I’d find embarrassing even 35 years after I worked there, and I’m sure 99 percent of my former colleagues (wherever they are today) would agree.

    • Post Author
      Jarrett Murphy
      Posted June 17, 2019 at 6:11 am

      That’s actually one of the issues with this law, Raanan — it provides a layer of secrecy to some employees but not others. Cops, firefighters, correction officers and emergency medical technicians are covered. Everyone is not. We discovered the law several years back when we set out to see cop disciplinary records after Bloomberg had released those for teachers.

      https://citylimits.org/2011/01/24/teachers-are-fair-game-but-cops-records-are-off-limits/

      I’d also note that the issue here is not personnel records writ large, but disciplinary records specifically. And there is a longstanding tradition of public-sector workers being subject to more public scrutiny than private-sector workers (e.g. your salary, civil service test scores, etc, are already public).

  • Jen
    Posted January 14, 2020 at 8:33 pm

    While this seems like a no brainer, a question I have is how many complaints are legitimate? What if someone is upset that they are getting arrested and decide to make a false claim that something happened when it didn’t? That officer would then have a mark on their record for some false claim. There needs to be some sort of checks and balances here. While body cameras would be ideal, to my knowledge not all officers have cameras yet.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: