Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Gowanus Sewage Cleanup Will Clear Out Several Businesses

11 Comments

  • The CleanUP Guys
    Posted December 8, 2017 at 8:45 am

    Hopefully, this will work. All too often sewage removal and sewage cleanup is necessitated by man’s decisions. To put something together that seems to be the right thing to do at the time, could be ok, for the moment. But as time elapses we sometimes realize after its all too late that maybe we should have done it another way. Especially when dealing with the environment involving a sewer leak or sewage backup, do we really need to be careful.

  • Abby C Grosslein
    Posted December 8, 2017 at 10:35 am

    Are there any measures to reduce the amount of waste going into the canal? What are the sources? Industrial? Household waste? Can we increase awareness or digest that waste; another way besides just dumping it?

  • Sue Wolfe
    Posted December 8, 2017 at 10:54 am

    Why didn’t you interview anyone connected with or use Thomas Greene Park? This story does not tell the whole story. I am president of the Friends of Thomas Greene Park. We are a not for profit advocacy group who has been working with local politicians and the Parks Department to improve this park for ten years. It now has kids and parents from Gowanus, Boerum Hill, Park Slope and Carroll Gardens who use this only green space in Gowanus as a destination for swimming, using a refurbished playground and picnicking. Thank you, Sue Wolfe

  • Steve de Seve
    Posted December 8, 2017 at 1:04 pm

    Unfortunately, this article leaves out a number of important points. The businesses mentioned are on land that is contaminated and needs to be cleaned, regardless of tank siting. The owner of the property that has the historic wall will probably sell his land to developers after the Gowanus rezoning, and the businesses will be displaced anyway. It is misleading to blame the sewage tanks for something that is inevitable due to both of these factors.

    Most importantly, the article leaves out the fact that, if the sewage tanks are built instead, on the local playground and pool site, that one third of the public use land there will be lost forever to the community and it’s children, many of whom live in public housing.

    This will likely trigger an environmental justice lawsuit which could delay any sewage tank building.

    While it is easy to relocate a few businesses that are going to be displaced anyway, the lost park land is harder to replace.

    The city is right to protect the rights and needs of it’s most vulnerable residents – the local kids from public housing.

    The article quotes “local activists” from one side only, which is unfortunate. It also fails to mention that the activists quoted, and the EPA, are trying to force the city to pivot to the destruction of a third of the park, and have been doing so for a long time. Taking a sudden interest in local businesses is just one in a long line of sad tactics used by these people who care little about public housing children, and who have shown this again and again over their years-long effort to deprive them of their park and playground. Quoting them out of context this way is more than a little misleading.

    This is a battle over a playground and pool used by local children who do not have enough outdoor space. There is a property owner who wants to cash in on his land when the rezoning happens. There are businesses which will be forced out in the rezoning, or slightly earlier by the sewage tank. There’s a historic wall whose owner doesn’t want it landmarked because it will reduce his land’s sell-out value to developers if he can hang on to it through the rezoning.

    But local activists, and EPA officials who care about local businesses? Not so much. Just the usual suspects using to press to force the city’s hand to put the sewage tank where they have always wanted it.

    Wait and see if these same people use THIS ARTICLE as a tool in their effort to delay city’s efforts to acquire the land for sewage tanks – and by doing so, try to force the city to destroy one third of the Thomas Greene Playground and Double D pool. I predict it will be used as a dagger in the backs of the kids who need their space to play by the very same local activists mentioned in this article.

  • native new yorker
    Posted December 9, 2017 at 6:08 pm

    So instead of temporarily using a park, which could be restored after construction, comrade deBlasio’s DEP wants to confiscate private property. This is more about making the area more attractive to developers than anything else, and more pleasant for deBlasio’s many supporters in the area.

    • Post Author
      Jarrett Murphy
      Posted December 10, 2017 at 8:38 pm

      The park could not be restored.

      • Lois
        Posted December 11, 2017 at 5:59 pm

        The park is currently a toxic waste hold –simular to Live Canal site where hiuses were built over chemical dumping grounds.
        Why, oh why does anyone want to kerp it as is?

  • Eve
    Posted December 10, 2017 at 9:15 pm

    I enjoyed reading this article, I felt it gave voice to those on the other end of the spectrum who will be impacted. Wether the city moves forward with this option or winds up building on the much needed park land for the area, I think it’s worth examining how these plans will likely effect those on this land. This is happening now, and I’m glad to learn that the city will offer some help in relocating the businesses that operate there now.

  • Water Mold Fire Restoration
    Posted March 3, 2018 at 6:26 pm

    Good to see that they are finally doing something to clean up the waters. Hopefully it does not burden the moved companies too much and everyone can be happy.

  • Mission Restorations
    Posted April 5, 2018 at 10:52 am

    Great to see them clean up the sewage. It should really improve the area in the long run. Any update on the project?

  • Saul M
    Posted August 12, 2021 at 10:16 am

    Wow this article was so insightful!

    Mold remediation Chicago
    mold keyword

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: