Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

CityViews: Long Island City does not Need a Vertical ‘Country-Club’ on Public Land

11 Comments

  • Ian
    Posted October 12, 2017 at 10:21 am

    Actually the project sounds good for the community. I would love this waterfront park and new school. Plus LIC needs new commercial development otherwise it is just a bedroom community. Mixed income housing is the only way to pay for it – plus there is still a housing shortage so more development will keep my rent down. I think most reasonable folks see the big picture. The city changes over time. We need to embrace it and just be happy these rent market rate condos.

    • Jenny O'Neill
      Posted October 24, 2017 at 12:16 pm

      “embrace it and just be happy these rent market rate condos”?
      “Mixed-income housing is the only way to pay for [new commercial development]?”

      This is utter nonsense. We need deeply affordable housing to avoid residents getting displaced—or worse, ending up homeless—and there is very little city-owned land left, where the city can control what happens. 100% deeply affordable housing should be built here, not luxury condos, not “country clubs” where residents never become part of the community, where the developers boast that residents can segregate themselves inside their vertical, gated “country club” communities without ever having to engage with their surrounding community.

  • Lic Bob
    Posted October 13, 2017 at 11:25 pm

    Excited about this project! Loving the developments here in LIC.

  • Ric w.
    Posted October 14, 2017 at 8:19 am

    I love living in LIC and I’m considering TFC when my current lease expires. Why do so many say NO to progress. I’d much rather see well designed, beautiful buildings that are managed by professional companies as opposed to big city / state run bland buildings. I would like to see more affordable rents, let them flood the market with apartments and the rents will come down or level. Say YES TO PROGRESS

  • Billy Rubin
    Posted October 14, 2017 at 10:57 am

    LOL. Love the comments by the paid real estate stooges above.

  • LES
    Posted October 14, 2017 at 11:08 am

    LIC is overbuilt. Same subway service for decades and EDC head James Patchett is a tool to REBNY. He should not be in charge and should of been fired ages ago. Patchett is the same guy who signed off on the Rivington deed since he was so inept.

  • Jerry Garcia
    Posted October 15, 2017 at 9:43 am

    Build baby build! I love LIC. I notice a lot of anti development articles on this site.

  • Ray Cev
    Posted October 15, 2017 at 3:45 pm

    The people posting above are paid trolls. There is no school or affordable housing in this project.

    • Ian
      Posted October 17, 2017 at 2:45 pm

      actually there is a requirement for an 80,000 SF school on site plus affordable housing, offices and tons of other community benefits. the haters don’t want to listen to the facts.
      they make up their mind based on emotion not rational thinking. 1 bedrooms in LIC are still expensive. we need to build our way out of this housing crisis. i hate crowned subways too but it is part of living in the greatest and most dynamic city in the entire world.

  • Bennett Melzak
    Posted October 18, 2017 at 1:49 am

    As LES mentioned above-

    EDC head James Patchett is a tool to REBNY. He should not be in charge and should have been fired ages ago. Patchett is the same guy who signed off on the Rivington deed since he was so inept.

    Need we say more.
    EDC needs to be investigated as it appears to be an ongoing criminal enterprise, with little compassion for NYC residents and multiple payoffs to the real estate mafia. By the way, tax write offs to real estate companies is corporate welfare with the peoples tax money!

  • Jenny
    Posted November 28, 2017 at 9:42 pm

    LOL pathetic real estate trolls. Actual community residents know that this development is a disaster for the neighborhood, and that most of us won’t be able to afford to live or work there, because the “manufacturing” space won’t be affordable work space for working artists manufacturers who would provide good jobs to local residents: the new tenants will be fancy “creative-tech” firms. And to top it all off, this is a massive giveaway of public land. Shameful and unconscionable.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: