Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Questionable Claims by Anti-Drug Program

3 Comments

  • Dan Courtney
    Posted January 29, 2015 at 11:41 am

    The program’s ties to Scientology are even more troubling than the article lets on. Scientology is an international criminal cult convicted of serious crimes virtually everywhere it operates (Eg. France’s high court ruled that the fundamental operation of Scientology is fraudulent). These “drug free” programs are designed to increase the potential source of victims for Scientology’s Narconon drug treatment, which is in fact Scientology indoctrination. Narconon is so dangerous that it’s Georgia facility was closed down after a patient death, and its flagship operation in Oklahoma is under criminal investigation and the subject of numerous lawsuits after three separate patient deaths. There are dozens of other lawsuits against Narconon detailing outright fraud and dangerous mistreatment of patients.

    The real lesson to learn is to just say NO to the Scientology front group Foundation for a Drug Free World.

  • And I'm Cute, Too
    Posted January 31, 2015 at 11:05 am

    And if Tidman had deviated from the carefully secularized materials, that could be corrected, she added.

    Uh-oh. Tidman went off-script, and the real teachings of the Co$ slipped out when they shouldn’t. He’s in trouble now. He’s public, so I don’t think he’ll get the RPF, but I suspect he’s been through “security checks” by now. Poor guy.

  • Paul V. Tupointeau
    Posted February 2, 2015 at 11:53 am

    So Drug Free World’s presentation to school children is “secularized”? What would a non-secularized version contain? For the Church of Scientology, there would be no teachings about God (they have none). They might say drugs impede spiritual progress by making people harder to “audit” (their Church’s sole “spiritual” pursuit, consisting of hypnotic memory regression: “progress” consists of incorporating Hubbard’s “space opera” fiction into your own recalled past lives). But here is the key: they are lying when they say the presentation is completely secularized, because the “inaccuracies” that stubbornly persist in their scripts are articles of their faith! Hubbard said that drugs stay in your fat cells and cause flashbacks, therefore this is dogma to them. It would be a High Crime in their Church to change the script to include current scientifically-valid information (never mind logic; this is a cult).

    Is this harmful? The children get some inaccurate information about drugs, which they push to the backs of their minds before they reach the door. The Church gets a little more integrated into society, their Narconon program gains publicity, more addicts sign up for it, some are helped, many more are harmed, the Church gets richer and gains some recruits. Did anyone notice that the DFW presentation makes no distinction between illicit drugs and medical prescriptions? The Church forbids many medicines: psychiatric drugs are forbidden and auditing is denied to those who take even a headache pill. People have died trying to do without their prescriptions during courses of auditing. Parents have denied medical care to children: Hubbard said most diseases can be audited away, even leukemia.

    This “Church” is a dangerous cult. Do not allow them this “thin edge” by which to insert themselves into your schools.

Leave a comment

0/5

To better help City Limits know and serve our community, please select all that apply: